Tag: civil war
Promoting 'Civil War' After Kirk's Murder? The Usual Suspects -- Including Russia

Promoting 'Civil War' After Kirk's Murder? The Usual Suspects -- Including Russia

Just as sickening as the terrible murder of Charlie Kirk is the stampede to weaponize his death, an ominous online scramble that has swept across the far right in recent days -- from tiny online accounts to Republican members of Congress to the White House, where the president himself mocked any effort to unify Americans and instead declared war on half the nation.

We know why Donald Trump seeks confrontation and division, presumably in hope of distracting attention from his poor approval ratings, his worsening economic data, his embarrassing, scandalous, and increasingly obvious connections with the dead pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Long before Kirk’s killing, Trump vowed “retribution” against his political opponents, and that tragic event now provides a fresh rationale for presidential vengeance.

But Trump and his bloody-minded MAGA cult are not the only political force that seeks to exploit “civil war.” Both he and his movement also remain what they became during the past decade: useful idiots for the geopolitical machinations of a hostile foreign power.

The shrillest noises now promoting violence and division in American society echo from the same figures who have long served up Russian propaganda in our media and politics – and they are easily identified, from Trump down.

Last year saw the exposure of a gang of “influencers,” under the patronage of an outfit called Tenet Media, with a stable that included such reliable MAGA mouthpieces as Benny Johnson and Tim Pool – and a multi-million-dollar payroll subsidized by Russia Today, the Kremlin’s central media apparatus. Their posts and podcasts routinely echoed Kremlin political themes, from sycophantic support of Trump to pushing Putin’s line on Ukraine. Naturally they all claimed to be innocent and unknowing “victims” of this Russian operation, an alibi that may be assessed in light of their generally poor credibility.

But today, Johnson and Pool are among the loudest voices promoting the “civil war” theme online, inciting fury against Democrats and demanding vengeance. Despite hundreds of condolence messages from Democratic elected officials, party leaders and ordinary voters, Johnson declared on various podcasts and his X stream that “the Democratic Party is not ‘sorry when political violence happens. They want it to happen. They create the conditions for it…”

He went to concoct a conspiracy theory claiming that “Left-Wing dark money groups fund, arm, and radicalize people to target you…They hype violence, glorify killers, and manipulate minds with drugs and social media…” Johnson is a notorious fabricator and plagiarist, and of course could not cite a fragment of proof to support those wild charges.

Tim Pool, also subsidized lavishly by Russia via Tenet, has spread a disingenuous propaganda line, “regretfully” proclaiming that the civil war has already begun – because the left and Democrats are gloating online over Kirk’s murder. He and Johnson are far from alone in promoting such dangerous, inflammatory reactions on the right. Even some Republican members of Congress, such as Wisconsin’s Derrick van Orden, are posting hysterical proclamations that “the gloves are off…The left and their policies are leading America into a civil war. And they want it. Just like the democrat party wanted our 1st civil war.”

Blaming the “democrat party” for Kirk’s death and announcing the inevitability of civil war may serve the short-term interests of Donald Trump, but exacerbating social tensions and violence in America remains the long-term goal of this country’s international adversaries – most notably in Putin’s Russia. And the principal exponent of the Russian dictatorship’s brand of imperial fascism, Alexander Dugin, has explicitly welcomed what he predicts will be the shattering impact of Kirk’s death in the United States.

The Putin adviser joined in with his own outrageously dishonest framing of the Democrats, suggesting on an Internet platform that “half of the Democratic Party – at the level of senators, at the level of congressmen, and at the level of their social network said: ‘Correct, we killed, we are killing, and we will continue to kill. They are all Nazis.”

Not a word of Dugin’s outburst was true, but his desire to intensify and inflame divisions in this country is utterly sincere. His comrades in the Russian intelligence services undoubtedly are employing artificial intelligence to supercharge the bots that they have long used to pursue such ends. Only a year ago, the Justice Department uncovered and disrupted a Kremlin operation that had sprouted thousands of fake social media profiles posing as Americans.

Who benefits from the civil war meme? Who is promoting it? Whoever does that here, whether ostensibly “right” or “left,” whether consciously or just plain stupidly, is doing the work of our country’s enemies.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024).

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Donald Trump

Trump Has Begun A New Civil War -- And We Must Stop Surrendering

We are losing the Second Civil War for the Union. Ten thousand were lost at the battle of Heath and Human Services. There were another 10,000 casualties at the battle of USAID. Thirteen hundred souls fell at the battle for the Department of Education. One thousand one hundred and fifty-five scientists have fallen at the battle of the EPA. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ordered a temporary halt to fighting raging at the Departments of Veterans Affairs, Agriculture, Defense, Energy, the Interior and Treasury, allowing unions and nonprofits to pick up their wounded from the battlefield during the ceasefire. The Trump administration struck back immediately and appealed the Ninth Circuit decision to the Supreme Court.

Surrenders are happening in Trump’s battles to defeat Union law firms. Two thousand lawyers from the New York firm of Paul Weiss threw down their arms after the firm’s commander, Brad S. Karp, walked into the Oval Office on March 19 and agreed to spend $40 million to support groups of Trump’s choosing if he would stop shooting at Karp's lawyers. Today, another New York firm, Skadden Arps, raised a white flag and threw $100 million at Trump’s feet in what was seen by legal experts as an abject surrender to Trump’s autocratic rule.

Yesterday, Trump added to his articles of Confederation when he issued an executive order calling on the surrender of the Smithsonian Institution, founded in 1846 for “for the increase & diffusion of knowledge among men.” From now on, according to Trump, the Smithsonian will be under the control of Vice President JD Vance and will be forbidden from putting on any “exhibits or programs that degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race, or promote programs or ideologies inconsistent with Federal law and policy.”

In addition, Trump ordered steps to be taken to restore “public monuments, memorials, statues, markers, or similar properties” that have been “removed or changed to perpetuate a false reconstruction of American history, inappropriately minimize the value of certain historical events or figures, or include any other improper partisan ideology.”

You know exactly what that means. They’ve already renamed Fort Benning and Fort Bragg after Confederate generals who lost more battles than they won. Now they’ll send teams of engineers around the country re-erecting statues to Robert E. Lee and General John Bell Hood, who lost more than 7,000 soldiers at the Battle of Franklin. They’ve already made teaching Black history illegal in some school systems and colleges around the country.

Now that Vance is in charge of the Smithsonian, how long do you think it will be until displays about the history of slavery are taken down at the National Museum of African American History and Culture? Do you think the word “feminism” will appear anywhere at all when they build the American Women’s History Museum?

Trump has been losing case after case challenging his executive orders in federal court. He has lost twice in courts of appeals, in Washington D.C. and California, in cases involving the firing of as many as 16,000 federal workers and his invocation of a 200-year-old wartime law when he deported alleged Venezuelan gang members to a notorious torture prison in El Salvador. He can’t win in court, so he has decided to intimidate lawyers and law firms who file and win cases against him. He’s rounding up foreign students from their apartments and dorm rooms and even off the streets for exercising their free speech rights in supporting Palestinian causes. How long before he orders the arrest of citizens for publishing political speech and even historical analysis that anger him?

We’re losing the Civil War that Trump started with his executive orders that effectively secede our federal government from the Union. The red states are already lost, some with abortion bans that don’t even allow exceptions for rape or incest. Advocates for Project 2025 want the Trump administration to use the long-dormant Comstock Act of 1873 to ban the shipment of abortion drugs and even medical equipment across state lines, effectively instituting a kind of passive national ban on abortion. Can a ban on birth control be far behind?

The First and Fifth Amendments are already constrained by Trump’s actions. He fired a cannon at the 14th Amendment with his executive order attempting to ban birthright citizenship. They’ve had their eye on equal protection of the laws since Brown v Board of Education and the Civil Rights laws. They want to bring back the “right of free association” that allowed segregated schools and public facilities in the states that lost what from now on we will have to call the First Civil War.

JD Vance is probably already working on a Smithsonian statue on the Mall for General Elon Musk, the Robert E. Lee of the Second Civil War.

We already know they won’t accept the results of the next presidential election if they don’t win. We are now confronted with this dark question: will our votes be enough to save the Union?

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. He writes every day at luciantruscott.substack.com and you can follow him on Bluesky @lktiv.bsky.social and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV. Please consider subscribing to his Substack.

Reprinted with permission from Lucian Truscott Newsletter.

J.D. Vance

J.D. Vance Says The Civil War Continues -- And He's With The South

In an interview on a far-right podcast, Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) invoked the Civil War, and suggested to the hosts that he's on the side of the Confederacy.

Conservative media outlet The Bulwark recently highlighted Vance's appearance in a 2021 episode of the Viva Frei podcast, in which he told hosts David Freiheit and Robert Barnes that in his view, the Civil War never really ended. Rather, the Hillbilly Elegy author posited that the North and the South are still battling for control of the cultural and political narrative. And he made it clear he was on the side battling the "Northern woke people."

"American history is a constant war between Northern Yankees and Southern Bourbons, where whichever side the hillbillies are on, wins," Vance said." And that’s kind of how I think about American politics today, is like, the Northern Yankees are now the hyper-woke, coastal elites. The Southern Bourbons are sort of the same old-school Southern folks that have been around and influential in this country for 200 years. And it’s like the hillbillies have really started to migrate towards the Southern Bourbons instead of the Northern woke people. That’s just a fundamental thing that’s happening in American politics."

The Bulwark's Jonathan V. Last remarked that he agrees with Vance, but was "just kind of shocked that he’s willing to admit that in this parallel, Democrats and liberals are the abolitionists and he’s on the side of the slaveholders."

"Actually, scratch that. I’m not shocked at all," he wrote.

Last contextualized Vance's 2021 remarks by putting them next to a key excerpt from his vice presidential nomination acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention (RNC) in July. In that speech, Vance echoed former presidential candidate Pat Buchanan's nativist rhetoric about immigrants (Buchanan ran for president in 1992 and 1996 on closing the Southern border and calling immigration an "illegal invasion").

"America is not just an idea. It is a group of people with a shared history and a common future. It is, in short, a nation," Vance said. "Now, it is part of that tradition, of course, that we welcome newcomers. But when we allow newcomers into our American family, we allow them on our terms."

As Last noted, Vance's comments on the 2021 podcast episode and at the RNC have a similar theme: Allowing new people into the country is up to the "American family," which naturally establishes a hierarchy between deserving "real Americans" and the undeserving others. And as the eventual 2024 Republican vice presidential nominee suggested to the Viva Frei hosts, the "Southern bourbons" and their "hillbilly" counterparts have more of a claim than the "Northern woke people."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Proud Boys And Other Extremists Seize On Trump Shooting To Push 'Civil War'

Proud Boys And Other Extremists Seize On Trump Shooting To Push 'Civil War'

After the attempted assassination of Donald Trump at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on Saturday afternoon, July 13, a long list of prominent Democrats — including President Joe Biden, former President Barack Obama and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California) — forcefully condemned the attack, emphasizing that such violence has no place in U.S. politics.

Regardless, Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) — once a scathing critic of Trump but now a devoted loyalist and possible running mate — blamed Democrats for the assassination attempt. Some other Republicans have pointed the finger at Democrats as well.

During an MSNBC segment on July 14, national security reporter Ken Dilanian warned that the Proud Boys and other far-right extremist groups have responded to the attack by calling for a civil war.

Dilanian told his colleague Kate Snow, "Several Republican members of Congress have directly blamed President Biden, the Democrats and the media for the assassination attempt. They claim it was a result of overheated rhetoric about Trump and part of a campaign to jeopardize his safety. So, for example, Georgia Republican Congressman Mike Collins posted, quote, 'Joe Biden sent the orders.'"

Dilanian continued, "And Trump campaign surrogate Nick Adams posted, on social media, quote, 'Joe Biden's rhetoric is directly responsible. There can be no discussion. This is a fact.'"

The reporter noted that although Democrats have "called Donald Trump an authoritarian and a threat to democracy," they "have never hinted that violence was an appropriate response to that."

Dilanian explained, "After this shooting, Democrats, including President Biden, have condemned it in the strongest possible terms, and they've called this political violence a threat to democracy…. And experts are worried that this kind of rhetoric increases the risk of more violence."

The MSNBC reporter warned that according to national security experts, "extremists" are "seizing on this incident.

"Telegram channels for branches of the Proud Boys militia group have been calling for civil war and violence," Dilanian told Snow. "According to Advance Democracy — that's an NGO that tracks this stuff — a user on one forum wrote that the Democratic National Committee, RINOs, and the feds, quote, 'should all be hung in the streets of D.C.' And users on a pro-Trump platform, Patriots.Win, are calling for violence and civil war. One user wrote, 'War now. They don't want to live and let live.' Some really dangerous rhetoric coursing around out there, Kate."

Dilanian observed that although some members of Congress are trying to calm the situation down, "flame-throwing politicians" are "not doing that at all."

"As long as there is some group of people who are throwing gasoline on the fire," Dilanian told Snow, "there are sort of a group of deranged individuals out there that are listening to it, paying close attention, and think they are essentially in a civil war."

Watch the full video below or at this link.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World